Advanced MVP · Rust-native

One Spark engine.
Embeddable and distributed.

A Rust implementation of Apache Spark with first-class Rust, Python, Java, Scala, SparkR-compatible R, TypeScript/Node, and SQL APIs. It runs as a 150 MiB Spark Connect binary or a 136 MiB embedded Python extension in-process — think DuckDB — or scales out across a cluster as a Spark-compatible distributed engine, or runs entirely in your browser via WebAssembly. Same code, same plans, four deployment shapes.

150 MiB
Spark Connect server; embedded Python extension is 136 MiB — no JVM bundled
100%
accepted compatibility-harness outcomes (10,233 / 10,233; implementation audit published)
99/99
TPC-DS queries at every scale through 1 TB, single-node
2.03×
faster than Apache Spark 4.2 — exact four-worker distributed SF=100, 99/99
7 APIs
Rust · Python/PySpark · Java · Scala · SparkR · TypeScript · SQL across 4 deployment shapes
The pitch

Standing on the shoulders of DuckDB and Apache Spark

DuckDB set the bar for embedded analytics — a single binary with vectorized execution. Apache Spark defined the API surface and deployment model for distributed compute. spark-rust adds the same engine in multiple lanes: one Rust query engine, four packagings, sharing the same analyzer, optimizer rules, physical plans, spill operators, and MLlib bindings.

In-process Python

pip install sparkrust, then sparkrust.connect(). No JVM, no daemon, no network — the engine runs inside your Python process and reads parquet directly. DuckDB-shaped ergonomics with the Spark API surface.

Faster than DuckDB @ SF=1000 TPC-DS

Single-node Connect server

The same spark-connect-server binary on localhost. Point unmodified PySpark (3.5 and 4.0 dialects), notebooks, or JDBC clients at sc://localhost:50051 and share one engine across clients.

Full gRPC Connect protocol

Distributed cluster

Same code, same query plans, pointed at a cluster driver. Executors receive encoded query plans, run them with their own Arrow-batched DataFusion, and shuffle over gRPC + Arrow IPC. Unmodified PySpark just works.

Distributed query plans · gRPC shuffle

In-browser WebAssembly

The same SQL core compiled to wasm32 and run client-side in a Web Worker — no server, no network, your data never leaves the tab. Spark dialect rewrites and UDFs all execute in WASM against in-memory Arrow batches.

Zero install · runs in the tab

Prototype in-process on a laptop, then deploy the exact same SQL or DataFrame code to a cluster through Spark Connect — without changing a line.

Language APIs

One relational engine, the same workloads in every API

Embed the engine directly from Rust or Python, or use Spark Connect from Rust, PySpark, Java, Scala, SparkR-compatible R, and TypeScript/Node. Rust and TypeScript also run against the embedded browser-WASM engine. SQL is the shared semantic layer across every surface.

Rust

Native SparkSession or remote SparkConnectSession, with the same lazy DataFrames, Columns, typed FromSparkRow decoding, and Arrow results. The Rust API also runs interactively in browser WebAssembly.

Embedded · Spark Connect · browser WASM

Python & PySpark

Embedded sparkrust with lazy relational methods, Arrow/pandas results, and UDFs; or unmodified PySpark 3.5/4.x over Connect.

Embedded or Connect

Java

Spark-shaped DataFrame, typed relational Dataset, Arrow results, DataFrameWriter, catalog operations, TLS/auth, cancellation, and Connect transport.

Java 17 · Connect

Scala 2.13

Scala facade over the JVM transport with DataFrames, typed relational decoding, writers, catalogs, and familiar column/function syntax.

Scala · Connect

SparkR-compatible R

SQL, lazy DataFrame verbs, grouping, joins, actions, Arrow LocalRelation upload, writes, and %>% workflows.

R · Connect

TypeScript / Node.js

Strict TypeScript SDK with gRPC, TLS/auth, Spark Connect plan builders, chunked Arrow IPC decoding, DataFrames, Columns, and actions.

Node 20+ · Connect

Rust embedded · Arrow-native

use spark_rust::prelude::*;

let spark = SparkSession::builder().build();
let rows = spark.table("sales").await?
  .filter(col("amount").geq(lit(3_i64)))?
  .group_by([col("region")])
  .agg([sum(col("amount")).alias("total")])?
  .order_by([col("total").desc()])?
  .collect_as::<(String, i64)>().await?;

TypeScript Connect or embedded WASM

import { SparkSession, col, lit, sum }
  from "@spark-rust/connect";

const spark = SparkSession.builder()
  .remote("sc://localhost:15002").getOrCreate();
const rows = await spark.table("sales")
  .filter(col("amount").geq(lit(3)))
  .groupBy("region")
  .agg(sum(col("amount")).alias("total"))
  .orderBy(col("total").desc()).collect();

Side-by-side, not hand-waved

See the same filter/aggregate, join, and null/distinct workloads in Rust, Python, Java, Scala, SparkR, TypeScript, and SQL. Relational plans can run distributed; local callbacks are named local, and arbitrary remote closures are not implied.

Single-node vs DuckDB

One-box TPC-DS trend — DuckDB leads small, spark-rust leads at 1 TB

Serial, one fresh process per query, both engines reading the same local Parquet on the same 32-core AMD EPYC 7763 worker. This July 13–14 run is the current hardware-controlled cross-scale comparison.

Scale factorspark-rustDuckDB 1.5.4SR / DuckDBCoverage
SF=116.4s · 99/999.1s · 99/991.81×0 row differences
SF=1051.4s · 99/9926.0s · 99/991.98×0 row differences
SF=100367.2s · 99/99136.9s · 99/992.68×0 row differences
SF=10003,350.6s · 99/996,854.9s over 98 common; Q85 timeout0.49× — spark-rust 2.06× faster0 row differences

0 row differences at every scale. DuckDB leads the smaller scales; at 1 TB spark-rust completes Q85, wins the common 98-query aggregate by 2.06×, and completes all 99 queries. Apache Spark 4.2 completed the same SF=1000 suite in 11,375.3s, making spark-rust 3.39× faster on the same worker.

Distributed vs Apache Spark 4.2

Exact four-worker comparison: 99/99 and 2.03× faster at SF=100

Serial Q1→Q99 production runs on the same four-worker cluster. Both engines use the same worker hosts and the same Azure parquet corpus.

Scalespark-rustApache Spark 4.2OverallPer-query wins
SF=100538.0s · 99/991,089.6s · 99/992.03× fasterrefresh pending
SF=10007,773.0s · 99/994,692.5s · 98/99; Q72 timeoutcoverage differs61/98 mutual

The current SF=100 spark-rust figure is the latest sealed width-8 full-survey A/B ON arm. ON and OFF both completed 99/99 with identical row counts; ON reduced aggregate query wall from 697.7s to 538.0s. Against Spark's exact-topology 1,089.6s result, that is 2.03× faster and 50.6% less wall time.

Spark's exact-topology SF=1000 run completed 98 queries in 4,692.5s; Q72 hit its honest 3,600s cap after pathological spill. spark-rust completes 99/99 in 7,773.0s. Over the mutually successful 98 queries Spark is 1.653× faster in aggregate, while spark-rust wins 61/98 and is 1.56× faster on the median query. Two recent query-plan improvements reduced Q35 to 12.642s and Q45 to 12.079s; those focused timings await a refreshed full-99 run before changing the aggregate headline.

Where it is in its lifecycle

All the major Spark capabilities, verified end-to-end

Spark SQL — full ANSI surface plus Spark extensions; 10,233 / 10,233 accepted by the graded compatibility harness; native-feature audit is separate.
DataFrames & Datasets — window functions, UDFs, grouping sets, ROLLUP/CUBE, lateral & recursive CTEs.
Spark Connect — full gRPC server; unmodified PyPI pyspark (3.5 & 4.0) connects and runs. Opt-in bearer-token auth + TLS.
HiveServer2 JDBC/ODBC — Thrift TCLIService (binary + HTTP + TLS + SASL); unmodified beeline / DBeaver / Tableau connect over jdbc:hive2://.
MLlib via Connect — LogisticRegression, RandomForest, k-means, FPGrowth, Pipelines, CrossValidator, model persistence.
Joins — broadcast hash, sort-merge, shuffle hash, broadcast nested loop, semi/anti, mark; adaptive Bloom-filter pushdown.
Adaptive Query Execution — partition coalescing, skew-join split, runtime broadcast switch, SMJ→BHJ swap.
Operator & shuffle spill — aggregate, sort, hash join, cross join, window, symmetric hash join → Arrow IPC on disk.
Structured Streaming — watermarks, session windows, state stores (RocksDB/file/memory), Kafka/socket/rate sources.
Storage & lakehouse formats — Parquet, ORC, CSV, JSON, Avro with predicate pushdown & bloom pruning; Apache Iceberg (REST/Glue/Hive catalogs, row-level DELETE/UPDATE/MERGE, merge-on-read, snapshot writes), Delta Lake (Liquid Clustering, OPTIMIZE/ZORDER, MERGE, DELETE/UPDATE, VACUUM, Change Data Feed), and Apache Hudi (COW/MOR snapshots, log-block updates/deletes, read-optimized, time travel, incremental reads, atomic local COW writes).
GPU acceleration (opt-in) — CUDA star-join & dense-group-by (spark-gpu) and RAPIDS cuDF GPU-native Parquet scan (spark-cudf), bit-exact vs CPU.
Object stores — S3, Azure Blob, GCS, local FS; metastore + DDL persistence across restarts.
Statistics & cost model — column histograms, ANALYZE TABLE FOR COLUMNS, planner hooks consuming stats.
Deployment — standalone gRPC executors, Kubernetes manifests, dynamic allocation, KEDA, graceful shutdown.
Live topology dashboard

Watch data flow across the cluster as queries run

A real-time topology page visualizes the cluster live: executors appear as nodes sized by active task count; shuffle edges light up with animated particles showing the direction and volume of in-flight transfers.

Per-executor counters: active tasks, shuffle read/write, result bytes
Cluster-wide cumulative pills: rows scanned, shuffle bytes, query count
Stale-ring indicators when an executor misses heartbeats
Playback pause for capturing the moment a query executes

Powered by a TopologyService gRPC server

The driver accepts executor registrations and per-heartbeat counter snapshots, fanned out via event logs to the history server's dashboard — so you can watch tasks, shuffle transfers, and cluster-wide totals update live as a query runs.

Four deployment shapes

One engine, multiple clients

The snippets below show deployment topology. The language section above covers the Rust, Python, Java, Scala, SparkR, TypeScript, and SQL APIs that target those deployments.

1 · In-process Python no daemon · DuckDB-shaped

# pip install sparkrust
import sparkrust

con = sparkrust.connect()
con.sql("CREATE VIEW sales AS SELECT * FROM read_parquet('sales/*.parquet')")
df = con.sql("SELECT region, SUM(revenue) AS rev FROM sales GROUP BY region")

df.show()        # PySpark-style tabular print
rows = df.collect()   # list of tuples
table = df.arrow()   # pyarrow.Table (zero-copy ready)
pdf = df.toPandas()   # pandas DataFrame

2 · Single-node Spark Connect server laptop-scale

# same spark-connect-server binary, run locally
import pyspark.sql
spark = pyspark.sql.SparkSession.builder.remote("sc://localhost:50051").getOrCreate()

df = spark.read.parquet("s3://my-bucket/sales/")
df.groupBy("region").agg({"revenue": "sum"}).show()

3 · Distributed Spark Connect cluster same code, point at a driver

# identical pipeline, now executed across N executors
spark = pyspark.sql.SparkSession.builder.remote("sc://driver.example.com:50051").getOrCreate()

4 · In-browser WebAssembly zero install · runs in the tab

// same SQL core compiled to wasm32, loaded in a Web Worker
import init, { run_sql_json } from "./pkg/spark_wasm.js";
await init();   // fetch + instantiate the .wasm engine

const rows = '[{"region":"west","revenue":10},{"region":"west","revenue":5}]';
const out = run_sql_json(
  "SELECT region, SUM(revenue) AS rev FROM data GROUP BY region", rows);
// no server, no network — your data never leaves the tab
Binary footprint

The whole engine in 150 MiB

No JVM, no bundled deps, no installer — dynamically linked against the same standard system libs. The Connect server and Python extension are different packagings of the same Rust engine. Current stripped Linux x86-64 release builds, measured at commit 84c06534:

ArtifactSize
spark-connect-server — full engine + Connect protocol, default features off150.26 MiB
sparkrust._sparkrust.abi3.so — in-process Python ext135.70 MiB
spark_wasm_bg.wasm — browser engine after wasm-opt25.13 MiB
spark_wasm_bg.wasm.gz — deployed transfer7.31 MiB
duckdb-1.5.4 — reference CLI59 MiB

For context, Apache Spark 4.2's distribution is ~330 MB compressed (~1 GB extracted) plus the JVM — reflecting its much broader feature surface.

How does this exist?

Built on Apache DataFusion

spark-rust uses a local fork of DataFusion — the Rust query engine that also powers Polars, ParadeDB, InfluxDB v3 and Sail — for Arrow-columnar vectorized execution, SQL parsing, optimization, and Parquet I/O. On top we add the Spark-shaped pieces: a Spark-dialect SQL layer, analyzer rewrites, spill operators, skew-join split, the gRPC shuffle service, the Connect server, MLlib over Connect, an Apache Iceberg / Delta / Hudi lakehouse layer (including Hudi COW/MOR reads and atomic local COW writes), a wasm32 build of the SQL core that runs Spark SQL client-side in the browser, and the topology dashboard.

On the roadmap

AI-native features ahead

Coming soon — the natural next direction once the core engine ships.

Natural-language SQL

Ask for queries in English, get them planned and run against your data.

Self-tuning execution

The engine learns from prior runs — cost-model population, plan-shape histograms, adaptive bloom-filter gating — and applies it to new queries automatically.

AI-assisted plan explanation

Ask why a query is slow; get a plain-language summary of the physical plan and per-operator metrics.

Try it right now — no install

Eleven demos run entirely in your browser

The exact same Rust engine, compiled to WebAssembly. Your data never leaves the tab.

spark-rust is currently in private development; open-source release is planned for the near future.